empty
empty


Patrick R. Casey Brings Winning Advocacy Experience to Elliott Greenleaf Law Firm


Henry F. Siedzikowski Named a Trustee of Juniata College
empty
read moreempty
empty
read moreempty

 

empty
 
empty

ELLIOTT GREENLEAF AGAIN SECURES DISMISSAL OF LUZERNE COUNTY AND COUNTY OFFICIALS IN JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER LITIGATION

In January 2009, state court judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan were indicted and charged with masterminding a kickback scheme in which they accepted payments from individuals and companies involved in the construction of private juvenile detention centers. The criminal charges cast a cloud over the adjudications of thousands of juveniles in Luzerne County and suggested that they were deprived of a fair tribunal. A number of civil suits, including two class actions, were filed in federal district court in the wake of the criminal charges, naming the by-now former judges, the individuals and entities involved in the detention centers, employees of the Juvenile Probation Department, the Juvenile Probation Department and Luzerne County. Elliott Greenleaf represented the County and its officials, and not the judges.

The Firm previously obtained dismissal of the claims against Luzerne County in the four initial lawsuits as well as two cases filed shortly thereafter. The court also denied efforts to amend complaints determined to be futile. Despite these substantial rulings from the District Court, a new complaint virtually copying the allegations that had previously been dismissed was filed in April 2011. The complaint named Luzerne County and three County officers, but thereafter did not make a single allegation about any of these defendants. Instead, plaintiffs simply claimed that all defendants were members of “an association in fact” and asserted that whatever one defendant did could be presumed to be the act of another. The Firm again moved for dismissal of the claims against Luzerne County and its officials, highlighting the previous rulings of the Court in the earlier juvenile detention center civil cases. Before the Court even had a chance to rule, and based solely upon the compelling arguments in the Firm’s brief, plaintiffs voluntarily withdrew their claims against the County and the County officers.

Elliott Greenleaf’s Tim Myers, Jack Dean and Debbie Simon are counsel for Luzerne County in these cases.

 

empty
 
empty

Philadelphia/Blue Bell
Elliott Greenleaf
& Siedzikowski, P.C.

925 Harvest Drive
P.O. Box 3010
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Phone: (215) 977-1000
Fax: (215) 977-1099
map >>

Philadelphia
Elliott Greenleaf
50 S. 16th Street
Suite 2960
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 940-8560
map >>

Scranton
Elliott Greenleaf & Dean
PNC Bank Adm. Building
201 Penn Avenue, Suite 202
Scranton , PA 18503
Phone: (570) 346-7569
Fax: (570) 969-2890
map >>

Wilmington
Elliott Greenleaf
1105 Market Street, Suite 1700
Wilmington, DE 19801
Phone: (302) 384-9400
Fax: (302) 384-9399
map >>

Wilkes-Barre
Elliott Greenleaf & Dean
39 Public Square, Suite 1000
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702
Phone: (570) 371-5290
Fax: (570) 371-5550
map >>

empty

Terms of Use | Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2003-2011 Elliott Greenleaf. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Elliott Greenleaf only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney-client relationship, which our website specifically does not create. Only having entered into a written, signed agreement with Elliott Greenleaf is an attorney-client relationship created.Because every case is different, the descriptions of awards and cases previously handled are not meant to be a guarantee of success. Any electronic communication sent to Elliott Greenleaf may not be secure, and thus may be disclosed. Accordingly, we request that you do not send sensitive or confidential information electronically. In addition, the sending of electronic mail to any lawyer or other address identified in this website does not create a lawyer-client relationship. The contents of any such mail are not privileged, unless the sender is a current client of Elliott Greenleaf, and the communication is sent pursuant to that attorney-client relationship.